A number of comments on my last post suggested I work on multi-core parallelism. There are a number of reasons why I am steering clear of that topic. Continue reading “Too many cores, not enough brains”
What’s next?
Since my last paper was rejected I have been thinking about what to do next. To tell the truth, by the time I had finished that paper I had lost interest in the topic. It seems that for the last few years I have been lurching around in different directions. Here are some of my thoughts about a new strategy. Please let me know what you think. Continue reading “What’s next?”
Is Programming Art?
A brief interview in a fledgling webzine.
They love me not
My GPCE paper was rejected, and rather harshly. You can read the reviews below. My analysis is that I was rejected for not being incremental to prior work in the field. Continue reading “They love me not”
Collections with stable iterators
Oh oracle of the interwebs –
I am writing a GPCE paper, and one of the contributions is a model of sequences (AKA collections) that has stable unshifting positions. Standard collections use an array abstraction where access is by integer ordinal position, which shifts under insertion and deletion. This manifests as the fact that iterators are broken by insertion and deletion operations. Linked list iterators also break under deletion.
Does anyone know of alternative proposals with stable positions/iterators? I don’t know of any, but I can’t be the first person to do this. Continue reading “Collections with stable iterators”