To the crazy ones

To: the crazy ones, the misfits, the rebels, the troublemakers, the ones who see things differently
Subject: you should write an Onward! paper

I and many people I know who are doing interesting work have been repelled by the bullshit parts of Academics: the gatekeeping, the compartmentalization, the performative rigor. Many of us have chosen to not play those games and instead make our own way as independent researchers. I’ve been in this fight for 20+ years now and I’m going to give you some advice you probably neither expect nor want to hear: publish.

Publishing a paper is the only proven way to engage with other researchers over the long term. Many people post demo videos and “web essays”, and if those meet your needs then by all means use them, for they are a lot easier and less risky than publishing papers. But they reach a different audience, mainly professional developers looking for something inspiring beyond the stagnant state of our art. They are not so effective in engaging with other researchers working on deep hard problems. Only papers have the time and space to explain our work in sufficient detail for others to learn from it and criticize it. Only papers painstakingly unravel the connections with other people’s work that we are building upon or improving upon. Only papers contain these burdensome elements because the peer-review process demands it, and for good reason: they are what carry a conversation between researchers iterating and refining new ideas. That is how progress actually happens, “by standing on the shoulders of giants”.

We need to ask ourselves a tough question: are we trying to add to human knowledge, or are we providing entertainment for jaded developers? The latter can be valuable, like science fiction, setting aspirations for the future. But to get to that future someone needs to solve hard problems in ways currently unimagined, and then communicate those discoveries to others who can appreciate them and improve upon them. Peer-reviewed papers are the best way we know to make progress happen.

I’m the program chair for Onward! Papers 2024. Onward! is expressly designed for people like us working on the fringe. You will not find a more welcoming place to publish computer science research. Onward explicitly reduces the need for rigorous evaluation and encourages interdisciplinary early-stage work with big aspirations. That said, you will still need to explain your ideas in concrete detail and convincingly argue their benefits over alternative approaches. Check out some of the recenty accepted papers. See the conference website for more details. Onward! gave me a crucial boost when I was getting started as an independent researcher. You should write an Onward! paper. Get in the arena.

The submission deadline is April 25, so you need to get started now! It is hard. In the worst case you are rejected, but at least you will get constructive feedback on how to convey your ideas more convincingly. As chair I will do my best to see that the reviewers provide helpful feedback. In any case just having put in the effort to write a paper will inevitably refine your ideas and your ability to explain them. In the best case you get an archival publication of your work, and you connect with a community of other researchers. My DMs are open.

Onward! and upward,
Jonathan Edwards

P.S. Thanks for helpful comments from Tomas Petricek, Stephen Kell, Geoffrey Litt, Mariano Guerra, and Richard Gabriel.

3 Replies to “To the crazy ones”

  1. Hey Jonathan,

    although knowing the deeper story I am not a big fan of Jobs, accepted the challenge, registered but got this message:

    Welcome to the Onward! Papers 2023 submissions site.
    The site is not open for submissions at the moment.

    My other problem is what to send… 🙂

    For example
    – I have an official rejected paper back from my PhD (abandoned because I realized I will neither get publication credits for what I want to write about nor get accepted by the Engelbart or Future of Text folks) https://mondoaurora.org/TheScienceOfBeingWrong_KAIS.pdf
    – I participated in various proposals, the latest is support for “citizen science” (I joined and wrote most of the text because I could write about Giskard, the system I work on) https://solve.mit.edu/challenges/learning-for-civic-action-challenge/solutions/72548
    – The really weird things I write in Java, I only care about research with working solutions in serious industrial / academic environment. So today I only rant occasionally, like this one https://github.com/MondoAurora/Giskard/wiki/LearningInIT
    – And you are right about “web essays”. This is one slide extracted from an online workshop at my university (nobody actually listened). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-TFazXf_RU

    So I think I fit the “To” definition, I am “in the arena” but I don’t yet see my next steps with this Onward thing.

    Suggestions, if any?

    1. “The site is not open for submissions at the moment.”
      Probably I should get the message and stay with the above listed forms… 🙂
      Thank you and good luck with Onward!

Leave a Reply